 
	Date: 2nd July 2018
Dear Teresa May                                                                                                         
		The UK EU Referendum Were the Public Misled
On the 23rd June 2016 the UK went 
		to vote in a national referendum which would determine whether the UK 
		would Remain a member of the EU or Leave the EU.  Our previous 
		Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron had implemented his promise: 
		if the Conservative party were elected, to hold a referendum on 
		membership of the EU.  At the time there was an outcry as the 
		government had produced and printed a pamphlet consisting of sixteen 
		pages at public expense: 
The pamphlet was delivered to all UK 
		households. I understand that it cost ten million pounds.  There 
		was considerable outrage at the time as large sections of the public 
		felt that the government had acted unfairly when opposing views had 
		considerably less to spend on their campaigns.
I voted to Leave the EU. However, on 
		reflection' I think that under the circumstances the government were 
		duty bound to advise the electorate as to whether to leave or remain 
		members of the EU. Without doubt the government's advice was to remain 
		members of the EU, its even in the title. The pamphlet is very well 
		written and laid out. If people had difficult understanding the issues, 
		they had plenty of time to ask friends and neighbours and listen to 
		discussions on TV, radio, newspapers and the Internet.
It is surely nonsense that anyone could have 
		been misled into voting to Leave the EU by the pamphlet.  It is 
		simply absurd for anyone to suggest that they were misled to vote 
		leave, on the contrary misled to remain could be a fairer claim.  
		May I remind the Prime Minister of her promises shortly after the 
		referendum result was made known:
"On 27 June 2016, David 
		Cameron's spokesperson stated that holding another vote on Britain's 
		membership to the European Union was 'not remotely on the cards.'[310] 
		Home Secretary Theresa May made the following comment when announcing 
		her candidacy to replace Cameron as Conservative leader (and hence as 
		Prime Minister) on 30 June: 'The campaign was fought ... and the public 
		gave their verdict. There must be no attempts to remain inside the EU 
		... and no second referendum. ... Brexit 
		means Brexit.'[311] 
		The petition was rejected by the government on 9 July. Its response said 
		that the referendum vote 'must be respected' and that the government 
		'must now prepare for the process to exit the EU".[312]
Unfortunately, owing to circumstances that 
		you as prime minister have been unable to overcome, it is now over two 
		years since the referendum in which over 17 million British people voted 
		to Leave the membership of the EU.  I believe that would have been more 
		if members of our government and others had not been carrying out scare 
		mongering and we were not tied to a First Past The Post system of 
		electing our MPs and an archaic House of Lords interfering.
Time has almost run out prime minister and I 
		am sure that the public will not wish that negotiations are extended 
		beyond the two years that are part of the EU's Article 50 Treaty on the 
		EU. 
Yours Sincerely, A.Citizen
The Prime Minister's office has replied to my letter below. I must apologise as I had mislaid the letter
		
lO 
From the Direct Communications Unit
5th July 2018Dear 
1 
		am writing on behalf of the 
		Prime Minister to thank you for your letter of
		2 
		July 2018.
The Prime Minister appreciates 
		the time you have taken to get in touch and share your views.
Thank you, once again, for 
		writing to the Prime Minister.
Yours sincerely

Correspondence 
		Officer